menthe Posted May 18, 2023 Share Posted May 18, 2023 Here's my tuppence's worth. I suggest that "normal" is like "average", nobody is actually normal or average. Average is really tricky as we are all on a spectrum. The average numbers of fingers of say everybody in France is not 10, more likely 9 and a bit. Many more people would have lost fingers than people born with extra digits. I stand being abnormal and far from average. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Posted May 19, 2023 Share Posted May 19, 2023 20 hours ago, JohnM said: Please re read all your comments and consider whether they could easily be interpreted in a way that you perhaps didn't intend. If someone can't (easily) interpret what I have plainly written then perhaps they shouldn't comment! How plain does it have to be, Janet and John level? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betise Posted May 19, 2023 Share Posted May 19, 2023 On 14/05/2023 at 17:37, Ken said: I, for one, am sick of the 'woke' attitude that seems to exist today. Queers, trans, perverts! Homophobia? What's wrong with normal? Can you explain your interpretation of normal? Also, are you saying queers AND trans AND perverts, or queers and trans ARE perverts? Brain firmly in gear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickP Posted May 19, 2023 Share Posted May 19, 2023 5 hours ago, betise said: Can you explain your interpretation of normal? Also, are you saying queers AND trans AND perverts, or queers and trans ARE perverts? Brain firmly in gear. I read it as and, not are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnM Posted May 19, 2023 Share Posted May 19, 2023 10 hours ago, Ken said: If someone can't (easily) interpret what I have plainly written then perhaps they shouldn't comment! How plain does it have to be, Janet and John level? Oh, don't worry, I'm pretty sure I know both what you said and the message that you were trying to convey. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Posted May 20, 2023 Share Posted May 20, 2023 19 hours ago, betise said: Can you explain your interpretation of normal? Also, are you saying queers AND trans AND perverts, or queers and trans ARE perverts? Brain firmly in gear. Open any dictionary and you will find the interpretation of the word 'normal', also the word abnormal. To help you though, if it is 'abnormal' it is not 'normal', by definition. As regards your question, There are trans, there are queers, there are also perverts, the list is almost endless! It's quite possible that some in those categories are all three definitions. equally there will be some who are abnormal in only one category. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Posted May 20, 2023 Share Posted May 20, 2023 13 hours ago, JohnM said: Oh, don't worry, I'm pretty sure I know both what you said and the message that you were trying to convey. Your are 'pretty sure' you know what I said and what I mean? Still not 'in gear' then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gardian Posted May 20, 2023 Share Posted May 20, 2023 Ladies & Gentlemen .......... The thing to always remember with Ken is that he always has to have ‘the last word’. It’s more than tiresome and as long as he continues to frequent this Forum, we may sadly have to live with it. More than a few have already been driven away by him. I’ve been trying to imagine a worse surprise attendee at dinner with friends. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Posted May 21, 2023 Share Posted May 21, 2023 8 hours ago, Gardian said: Ladies & Gentlemen .......... The thing to always remember with Ken is that he always has to have ‘the last word’. It’s more than tiresome and as long as he continues to frequent this Forum, we may sadly have to live with it. More than a few have already been driven away by him. I’ve been trying to imagine a worse surprise attendee at dinner with friends. And yet more for the ladies and gentlemen! I was wondering when this poster would enter the fray! As usual with nothing to say. Oh, and I'm so grateful to be allowed on 'his' forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riggers Posted May 21, 2023 Share Posted May 21, 2023 Well Ken’s got what he wanted in a way,a lively active topic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveLister Posted May 21, 2023 Share Posted May 21, 2023 I've no proof but I don't believe that Ken really exists. I think he's an algorithm designed to attach itself to various words and phrases and then aggressively post something inflammatory . Some of the sentence structures are a little off. Also there are the times he contradicts himself between threads. Then there's 'shadow Ken'. I've stopped engaging directly. You can't argue with an algorithm. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ssomon Posted May 21, 2023 Share Posted May 21, 2023 (edited) I don't consider him as people. Actually I wouldn't even p*ss on him if he were on fire. Edited May 21, 2023 by ssomon grammar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Posted May 22, 2023 Share Posted May 22, 2023 6 hours ago, ssomon said: I don't consider him as people. Actually I wouldn't even p*ss on him if he were on fire. Oh, they are really coming out of the woodwork now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveLister Posted May 22, 2023 Share Posted May 22, 2023 Moderator Dave Ladies and Gentlemen, I'll think you'll agree that we have probably come to the end of the road on this thread so I'm locking it before it degenerates any further. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts