cajal Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 [quote user="AnOther"]You're effectively calling me a liar then !I've re-read both my posts, and you know what, I can't see anywhere that I implied that you are a liar. I do however consider I did other members a favour by explaining the possible repurcussions should they decide to download a file from a link posted by yourself. Remember I didn't post the link...you did.And BTW if you have that little confidence in your AV catching something (assuming there was something to catch which there isn't) then I suggest you change it forthwith.[/quote]Again I am unable to see where I wrote or implied the above statement you made but thanks for the heads up regarding my choice of AV and the earlier disparaging remarks regarding my choice of pdf reader. However it would appear they served me well on this occasion. Considering I have used Foxit for over 10 years and this is the first occasion that I have ever received a message of this nature I will continue with the combination of AV and pdf reader as it appears they performed as required. Now the words hole, digging and stop spring to mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pomme Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 If anyone wants to see the content of the document AnOther posted, rather than worrying about downloading the file, a link to it on the Spectrum web site has been posted elsewhere French Tax Changes 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnOther Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 I told you it was safe in the original post, that was the truth and it remains the truth.I said it to assuage the often irrational fears people can have when downloading files but I would have hoped that those who know me (not you apparently) would trust me not to post something unsafe.Having conclusively proved it's a FF issue I apologise to Foxit but it was you who accused that of flagging the file not me.Ultimately then nothing has 'served you well' because it's a proven false positive but good luck with your little bubble of self delusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cajal Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 [quote user="AnOther"]I told you it was safe in the original post, that was the truth and it remains the truth.And I told you what Foxit reported to me. That was the truth and it remains the truth.I said it to assuage the often irrational fears people can have when downloading files but I would have hoped that those who know me (not you apparently) would trust me not to post something unsafe.Spot on. I don't know you. You are just a member of a site I frequent.Having conclusively proved it's a FF issue I apologise to Foxit but it was you who accused that of flagging the file not me.As I see it I didn't accuse anyone of anything.Ultimately then nothing has 'served you well' because it's a proven false positive but good luck with your little bubble of self delusion.I must question your assertion here. Having downloaded your corrupt file and taken the Foxit precaution message at face value I now know that I'm not in possesion of an infected computer.Well, as to the bubble of self delusion, I suppose I must concede to your superior knowledge as I am not a sufferer from Dunning-Kruger effect. I now accept that it must appear inconceivably audacious of me to question anything you post and I accept that in future if I deem to open any link of yours and I happen upon an issue 'discretion' will be the order of the day and s.o.d everyone else. Great weez eh? [/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonzjob Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 For those not familiar with it The Dunning–Krugereffect is a cognitive biasin which low-ability individualssuffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly assessing their abilityas much higher than it really is. Dunning and Kruger attributed thisbias to megacognitive incapacity, on the part of those with lowability, to recognize their ineptitude and evaluate their competenceaccurately. Their research also suggests corollaries: high-abilityindividuals may underestimate their relative competence and mayerroneously assume that tasks which are easy for them are also easyfor others.Dunning and Kruger havepostulated that the effect is the result of internal illusion inthose of low ability, and external misperception in those of highability: "The miscalibration of the incompetent stems from anerror about the self, whereas the miscalibration of the highlycompetent stems from an error about others.So don't say that you don't know, even if you like me are a bit dim [8-)][:-))] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cathar Tours Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 If anyone is interested I tried to download this on my works computer this morning (yes I know it's Saturday but I love my work). Once it was downloaded it was immediately quarantined and I was told to contact our IT department (which is open 24/7).I asked them if there was a problem to which they asked what was the file for so I told them it was for my dad and was it infected or something. They told me there is nothing wrong with the file (specifically no virus, worm, Trojan etc.) it's just that the URL source has a reputation for being dodgy (it's Polish although I am not sure what relevance that is). Anything from that site is automatically quarantined regardless. They then granted me access to the file and I attach it to an email to my dad without a problem.I am working in an R&D facility for one of the biggest car (and other vehicle) manufacturers in the world spanning many continents (with the exception of Mexico when it comes to compact cars!) and they take their IT extremely seriously. With that in mind I would say your pretty safe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyh4 Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 Boy did someone have a bad night last night - and it wasn't me.Sorry Andy but I do take being told to 'get real' personally.No one told you to get real. I reported exactly what my AV protection system told me.I've used Tinyupload many many times in the past and never had a problem like this but having checked a few things I've determined that it's FF itself which is false reporting it as a virus or malware.I did not say that tinyupload had a problem. I used your second link, which only showed a "problem" when I tried to download the pdf itself. Hence the form of word I used.Turn off 'Block dangerous downloads' in the security settings and it works as it should, you don't need that set anyway because if you've got a decent up to date AV running it will be far more accurate and reliable than any browser which will only be as relevant as it's last update which could be weeks or months old.Frankly I am as computer illiterate as anyone on this site. If you think it is a good idea for people to turn off their protection (even if they knew how to do it - and I don't ) when they understand the computer system so badly, then I think you are unintentionally inviting people who know no better to disarm their computers. Incidentally I usually get several updates per month - a bit of a pain, but there you go, that is the price of security. Mine is turned off which is why FF isn't flagging it for me, furthermore I've downloaded the file myself and compared it to the original and there are no changes to it whatsoever which there would absolutely be if had been tampered with by Tinyupload.As said I did not use the tul link and the problem is from where the pdf comes from not any intermediate site.From what I'm seeing Dr Web seems to be some sort of minor 'also ran' player in the AV arena so you'll excuse me if I take what it says about Tinyupload with a large portion of scepticism.Dr Web may be a minor player, but then they are Russian based - and where do many of the Trojans, worms and viruses come from? Russia so it would seem. [And no, no reference to whether Russia may or may not have influenced a major power's election.]I have used "grade 1", highly recommended internationally renown systems in the past and many have brought me nothing but grief. Worst of the pack seems to Norton which has brought my system to a halt or slowed it to a virtual standstill on several occasions. Frankly I would rather use "a minor player" which gives me a few false positive reports than a mainstream system that either does not work as it should or stops my computer working.I can find no other authoritative evidence claiming that the site is anything other than what it seems which is a simple and transparent file hosting service.Being transparent there is of course nothing to stop somebody uploading moody files for the unwary to download but that's not the fault of the site and it's up to the individuals downloading from it to perform due diligence.JJFWIW = for what it's worthBTW = By the wayAV = Anti VirusI do hope you have aa better nights sleep tonight and wake up tomorrow in a better mood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonzjob Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 Ta for that Andy. AV, obvious if you don't have a Mac [6] but the others were unknown to me. Or would that be UTM?Just waiting now for some €€€€ from our Impot after our visit between Krimble and New Years. That was a real experience to walk into an EMPTY Impot office, apart from a few staff, and in/out within 25 minutes. A querie as to why they hadn't paid part of the money we has asked for before.Don't ask what it was because the Chef looks after anything wot I can't hit wiv a 'ammer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SC Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 Just a quick one folks to see if anyone knows of a quicker method than queuing at CPAM and asking them to write a letter of conformation.Re reclaim of CSG, I've been asked for an attestation for 2014 (I supplied a current attestation in 2016). As I've dutifully destroyed most of my previous attestations as instructed, does anyone know if there is an official name for what I need or an easy way to get a copy of an old attestation?Thanks in advance, Steve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idun Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 ALL I CAN SAY IS: -'TRUST NO ONE' 'DO NOT DESTROY ANYTHING'KEEP COPIES OF EVERY LAST THING, AND RELUCTANTLY THROW ANYTHING AWAY - MAYBE THREE YEARS AFTER IT HAS ALL BEEN SORTED OUT TO YOUR SATISFACTION!This is the best advice I can give anyone anywhere these days. It is about protecting one's self against bureaucrats who do not know their culs from their elbows and in some respects, never did[Www]Being dutiful is one thing, but your priority and duty of care is simply to yourself. Good luck! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fittersmate Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 We went to our local CPAM and explained what we needed, ie attestation for 2012 and 2013 (for reclamation of CSG). The lady printed out the latest attestation and then added a handwritten note confirming that we had been covered by S1 since 2009 without a break. She signed the attestation and stamped it. This was accepted by the tax office. Didn't take very long at all and we came away with exactly what we needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SC Posted January 17, 2017 Share Posted January 17, 2017 Thank you for that, hopefully we'll find a co-operative operative!Steve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grecian Posted January 17, 2017 Share Posted January 17, 2017 I would just like to say thank you to parsnips, after just over a year of submitting our claim for our social charges refund, things were finally sorted out just before Christmas. It took just over a year in total.So thank you very much parsnips for all your assistance that you provided, and the template letter that you generated. I hope that you have had your social charges refund also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judith Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 Finally, today, I had my letter saying - no - cannot prove you are affiliated - off to give the accountant who dealt with it a rollicking - she was supposed to have got all the details she needed from us! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parsnips Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 [quote user="Grecian"]I would just like to say thank you to parsnips, after just over a year of submitting our claim for our social charges refund, things were finally sorted out just before Christmas. It took just over a year in total.So thank you very much parsnips for all your assistance that you provided, and the template letter that you generated. I hope that you have had your social charges refund also.[/quote]Hi, Thank you for your kind words. Last week, after my re-sending S1 details the tax office asked for a RIB , so fingers crossed for a possible result. I'll let you know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mint Posted January 18, 2017 Author Share Posted January 18, 2017 Parsnips, any feedback, positive or otherwise, as to whether claims for 2015 were allowed, please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SC Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 Thank you to Fitter's Mate for that info. The lady at CPAM today responded to my prepared French phraseology and my scary post Christmas bulk. Aided by being particularly nice to the college stagiaire who was shadowing her I achieved something similar, stamped and signed. Hopefully that will be enough.I must also say a very big thank you to Parsnips.Steve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grecian Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 Well mint, as I have already posted on another thread, our 2016, 2015 income, social charges have been refunded in full. I received a revised bill showing that the two earlier payments had been refunded, and no further payment was due on the third balancing payment that any adjustments are made.Regarding the three earlier years that I claimed for, I received the refund in two tranches, I received interest on the French income within my assurance vie that I had claimed for, but on my 'Little England' sorry UK interest no interest was paid. I have decided not to pursue the missing interest as I have been refunded the 2015 social charges, and as it seems a lot of other people have not. So I have decided to take the money and run.[:D]Glad to hear that you should finally receive your refund parsnips, you are not a 'marked man' after all in instigating all these Brits claiming their social charges back.[:D] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mint Posted January 18, 2017 Author Share Posted January 18, 2017 Grecian thank you for the info and BTW I hope you are well restored to health[:)] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parsnips Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 [quote user="mint"]Parsnips, any feedback, positive or otherwise, as to whether claims for 2015 were allowed, please?[/quote]Hi, I submitted a claim for repayment of 2015 income contributions soon after the demands came last autumn , I was told it was sent to the legal department, and have not yet received a refusal- (or a refund). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hereford Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 We had a formal letter of refusal, giving the reason that the law was changed in December 2015.I think we have already posted this but thought I would repeat it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mint Posted January 19, 2017 Author Share Posted January 19, 2017 Thank you, Parsnips and Hereford. Yes, Hereford, I do remember you posted about this but, subsequent to your post, someone on the Forum said that they'd had their claim allowed, perhaps it was Grecian. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laurier Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 Yes, I received the same letter of refusal in that the law was changed.Laurier Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parsnips Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 [quote user="parsnips"][quote user="mint"]Parsnips, any feedback, positive or otherwise, as to whether claims for 2015 were allowed, please?[/quote]Hi, I submitted a claim for repayment of 2015 income contributions soon after the demands came last autumn , I was told it was sent to the legal department, and have not yet received a refusal- (or a refund).[/quote]Hi, At Last! I have had a letter conceding full repayment for 2011,2012,2013, and 2014. (and promising interest). For 2015 income they have repaid contributions I claimed which were "prélévé" from my french life assurances, and my taxable PEL, all of which were taken on 31/12/2015. They have not refunded contributions on dividends and foreign interest which were declared and taxed in 2016 . Once I have the money in my hands , I shall pursue this issue until the CJE rules definitively. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mint Posted February 2, 2017 Author Share Posted February 2, 2017 Congratulations, Parsnips! And thank you for letting us know about the 2015 contributions. I might send off an email initially to see how the ground lies or go the full hog and send in all the necessary docs.Nothing ventured, nothing gained, huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now