woolybanana Posted December 13, 2011 Share Posted December 13, 2011 ..... if the UK Union splits up, where will the different parts stand on the various EU treaties? Which country will 'inherit' these?Now, if I were a serious Eurosceptic, would I try to break upn the Union as it would force the resigning of the treaties, for which referendum on membership would be needed? Or is that too Machiavellic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pommier Posted December 13, 2011 Share Posted December 13, 2011 I don't believe that Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland could be persuaded, cajoled or bribed into leaving the union, no matter how much England might wish it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolybanana Posted December 13, 2011 Author Share Posted December 13, 2011 So, Alex Salmond is just so much wind then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pommier Posted December 13, 2011 Share Posted December 13, 2011 Yep. He knows that the Scots wouldn't vote to leave the union in a referendum so he can talk about it as if it was possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idun Posted December 13, 2011 Share Posted December 13, 2011 I heard it said that they would be the most acrimonious of divorces if that happened. Why not the whole hog, we'll have a free Basque state, a free Breton State, we could get all the old borders from a few hundred years ago and have done with it. What interesting times we live in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoddy Posted December 13, 2011 Share Posted December 13, 2011 In that case may I have the Danelaw back please ?Hoddy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idun Posted December 13, 2011 Share Posted December 13, 2011 Why Danelaw? were women treat particulary well under danelaw? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoddy Posted December 13, 2011 Share Posted December 13, 2011 Not particularly, but better than they were after 1066. It's just that if we're thinking about now I think some regions could do better on their own.Hoddy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idun Posted December 13, 2011 Share Posted December 13, 2011 Yes, pre 1066 would probably be best really, apart from the Viking raiders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
just john Posted December 13, 2011 Share Posted December 13, 2011 Don't be daft, no central heating then. . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolybanana Posted December 13, 2011 Author Share Posted December 13, 2011 just warm bodies in piles!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitty Posted December 14, 2011 Share Posted December 14, 2011 [quote user="just john "]Don't be daft, no central heating then. . .[/quote]The Romans had central heating and pizza takeaways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frederick Posted December 14, 2011 Share Posted December 14, 2011 And the Vikings just had piles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
just john Posted December 14, 2011 Share Posted December 14, 2011 [quote user="Kitty"][quote user="just john "]Don't be daft, no central heating then. . .[/quote]The Romans had central heating and pizza takeaways. [/quote]Hi Kitty, good to see you posting,I think their lease had expired before 1066, but ok, central heating and pizza takeaways, apart from that ,What have the Romans ever done for us?[:D] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now