I think there is some dodgy ground here.....(need a 4x4 then)...sorry.. Plenty of european car manufacturers produce 4x4 vehicles that most people wouldn't be aware of even if it fell on them. The new Jaguar is 4x4, Volvo estate, Renault, Honda&Toyota (built in uk), Porche sports car. etc,etc. Are the police going to stop cars and look underneath to see if it has 4 wheel drive? Is it 4x4 drivetrain system that people object to or is it the "utility" style vehicles like Landrover/Rangerover/Mseries Merc/Xseries BMW/Rav/Frontera etc.etc. I have had a 4x4 previously because it was practical at the time. Currently because of the huge number of motorway miles I drive, I own a BMW saloon with a 4.4lt engine that is more economical when driven sedately that my wife's Fiesta 1.6 being driven hard. My BMW V8 is also better on emissions than the Ford! There should be more focus on dirty diesels - not the efficient clean(ish) modern ones - but the smoke billowing vans/trucks/buses etc that soot up the cities and emit harmfull particulates into the atmosphere. I personally think that a lot of the critisism is covering an envy/jealousy attitude by some people who believe that the driving of a "utility" style vehicle is a statement of wealth, lifestyle or social status that are not party to. For god's sake ken Livingstone doesn't even drive. Sorry...I am starting to rant. When I get to France it is my intention to change to a 4x4 simply for the practicality it will bring in terms of space and application on the land I intend to buy.