woolybanana Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Ah, Thibault remembers the randy vicars of the News of the World. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tancrède Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 [quote user="Thibault"]the undercover 'sheikh' who acted as an agent provocateur? This case would seem the same type of thing.[/quote]Exactly.[quote user="Thibault"]I have just listened to a barrister on PM discussing the possibility of the Sunday Mirror and its journalist being prosecuted - I hope they are.[/quote]Hear ! hear !The whole self-righteous shenanigans stinks of - and I shrink from mentioning the ludicrous word - sexism.If the said undercover hack journalist had enticed some D-list political harridan from amongst the strident Guardian-toting sisterhood to send, under false pretences, a pic of her saggy tits, there would by now be hell to pay, Questions in the House, and a general vociferous brandishing of castrating irons against the journalist.I do not see this case as being in any way different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idun Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Firstly there is nothing wrong with women's breasts, whatever their form! Would a woman have been so stupid as to send such a photo, well it is quite possible that some one with an exaggerated sense of self might do that.............. and there would have been a stink too. I cannot account for other people's stupidity, no matter their gender!If you look at this bloke's biography, you see Havard and Oxford mentioned, I often wonder what exactly defines 'clever', because for a clever bloke he's looking pretty stupid at the moment.Idun (female)EDIT ps no one made him do this, he sent these photos willingly to someone he did not know! Just how many posters on here have intimate photos handy in their phones or on their internet things, just in case someone chats them up and asks to see such images. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NormanH Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 There is absolutely nothing wrong in a newspaper showing up what a load of filth the Tories are, giving a bit of balance against the Murdoch-controlled empire and the loathsome Daily Mail's constant peddling of the other line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolybanana Posted September 29, 2014 Share Posted September 29, 2014 Norman, stop your booze filled nonsense; the difference between the parties is that the Tories like escorts and the Labour party prefer hookers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonzjob Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 The torys may prefer escorts but some of the radicals prefer jags. They may also like the odd number 9 but Prescot definately liked his 2 jags [Www]Not too sure what rugby has to do with cars though [8-)] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quillan Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 [quote user="NormanH"]There is absolutely nothing wrong in a newspaper showing up what a load of filth the Tories are, giving a bit of balance against the Murdoch-controlled empire and the loathsome Daily Mail's constant peddling of the other line.[/quote]It would be even better if both newspapers told the truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NormanH Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 The story reminds me of the old joke that a man has a brain and a p*nis, but not enough blood in his body to let both work at the same time... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.