Jump to content

Personal settings


Cassis
 Share

Recommended Posts

I believe that may, possibly, be the case.

What we REALLY need is a warning when you log on that a PM has been received - some people obviously don't check, or check their emails, or aren't warned by email or something. Whatever, they never read PMs or reply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So the "1 view" of my PM to Ty Korrigan some weeks ago was not a viewing at all but simply down to me posting the message. I assumed it was showing that he had read it and that the lack of a response was that he had chosen not to acknowledge it. If I have correctly understood this thread, he hasn't a clue (unless he now reads this, which is a little late in the day) that I sent him a message. 

Perhaps I should have posted one of the "daft messages" saying I had PM'd him....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

***Perhaps I should have posted one of the "daft messages" saying I had PM'd him....***

Sometimes it is: necessary/ diplomatic/ helpful/ politic/ polite or simply more efficient to do just that. That is what I have discovered. 

Sue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote user="Spg"]

***Perhaps I should have posted one of the "daft messages" saying I had PM'd him....***

Sometimes it is: necessary/ diplomatic/ helpful/ politic/ polite or simply more efficient to do just that. That is what I have discovered. 

Sue

[/quote]

So would emailing be more reliable than PM-ing on this forum?  What, effectively, is the difference between PM-ing and emailing in terms of privacy and end result?  Serious question!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...