woolybanana Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 The article below suggests that the Titanic's hitting the iceberg was caused by a steering error, when the wheel was turned to port despite the order being the opposite, and that this error was hidden until now. BUT, if anyone watches the film (latest version), they will notice that this is just what does happen at that critical moment. Coincidence, double cock up?http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/booknews/8016752/Titanic-sunk-by-steering-blunder-new-book-claims.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chancer Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 Just hype to sell a book, among the text there are two mutually exclusive passages According to a new book, the ship had plenty of time to miss the iceberg but the helmsman panicked and turned the wrong way. He turned the ship right instead of left and, even though he was almost immediately told to correct it, it was too late and the side of the starboard bow was ripped out by the iceberg. This is not a motorcycle swerving to miss a rabbit, a behemoth like that takes a very long time to even begin to respond to control inputs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 "...has revealed it in her new novel." I was always under the impression that a novel was a work of fiction.Coincidentally, only last week I was on the bridge (and had earlier been in the engine room) of a historic steamship which has the same machinery, though on a much smaller scale, as the Titanic. Seeing the procedure for docking that at Southampton, and the time involved between an order being given and anything happening, and bearing in mind that this ship is a fraction of the size of the Titanic I would 100% agree that 'plenty of time' would be measured in hours rather than seconds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnRoss Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 Sub Lieutenant Phillips on the bridge and CPO Pertwee at the wheel? Left hand down a bit Chief? Maybe not but sounds a bit like it!.......................JRPS Lot of info here: http://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/theme/Port+Around/ inc Titanic's Final Manoeuvre Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thibault Posted September 23, 2010 Share Posted September 23, 2010 But isn't this an old story based on the fact that in 1912 the orders for going round an object are the opposite to the orders given today. I can't quite remember the actual details - but it has been discussed on a lot of Titanic sites. Murdock gave orders to "port around" the iceberg and that was the standard procedure at the time.Any "historic" sailors out there to fill in the details? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubbles Posted September 23, 2010 Share Posted September 23, 2010 Maybe Salty Sam! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salty Sam Posted September 23, 2010 Share Posted September 23, 2010 [quote user="bubbles"]Maybe Salty Sam![/quote]Courtesy of the ancient mariner [:)].There is nothing new regarding this latest 'scoop'.[url]http://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/titanic-final-manoeuvre.html[/url] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.