pachapapa Posted April 22, 2011 Share Posted April 22, 2011 Well! Well! Now we have the final transcendental version of a "super injunction"; I wonder did a Judge suffer from the complementary synergy of a neuronal blood clot assisted by a long line of coke or did the Angel Gabriel descend and sit on his shoulder and whisper in his ear!Does "contra mundum" apply to the International Space Station and the final epic flight of Endeavour, indeed does it apply in the 4th dimension?Would St Peter be silenced at the Pearly Gates.[:D][:D][:D] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard51 Posted April 22, 2011 Share Posted April 22, 2011 PacSorry, but I'm winding down (with vino) from a long week - but what are you talking about?Richard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pachapapa Posted April 22, 2011 Author Share Posted April 22, 2011 [quote user="Richard51"]PacSorry, but I'm winding down (with vino) from a long week - but what are you talking about?Richard[/quote]On Wednesday, High Court judge Mr Justice Eady agreed to issue a "contra mundum" order - effectively a worldwide ban - in the case of a man who sought to prevent publication of material about his private life.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13158087 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEO Posted April 22, 2011 Share Posted April 22, 2011 Won't this injunction only apply in the UK? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard51 Posted April 22, 2011 Share Posted April 22, 2011 Thanks, I'm on board now.Richard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pachapapa Posted April 22, 2011 Author Share Posted April 22, 2011 I would just like to confirm that I do not know THIS LADY[IMG]http://images.dailyexpress.co.uk/img/dynamic/79/285x214/241993_1.jpg[/IMG]and will not be seeking an injunction applicable at the Buena Vista Social Club.[;-)] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russethouse Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Sadly the judge seems to have forgoten about Twitter and Facebook and its fairly easy to find at least 3 of the people with these super injunctions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolybanana Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 So, Spacecontrol to Major Tom could not names names, but what about Major Tom?Well, yes, but don't they have a right to privacy, unless of course they are not practising what they are preaching?As a matter of interest, I wonder if this could be used by an institution to hide moral wrongdoing by its employees - such as the Church?Of course, it is a reaction to an over-intrusive press pack, though I wonder if it will be used to muzzle real investigative journalism? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russethouse Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 Well, yes, but don't they have a right to privacy, unless of course they are not practising what they are preaching?I think it's pretty common knowledge that one particular gentleman has got the injunction on the grounds that he doesn't want other children taunting his kids in the playground, about his indiscretions...If you can't do the time, don't do the crime....................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoddy Posted April 26, 2011 Share Posted April 26, 2011 Interestingly, Andrew Marr has announced this morning that he is one of the famous four. Apparently Private Eye had been contemplating taking a court case against him and Marr agreed that it was hypocritical of him to ban reporting on himself while he was pursuing politicians for the truth.Hoddy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.