Quillan Posted February 28, 2006 Share Posted February 28, 2006 News at 10 tonight, cat dies of H5N1 in Germany, the first step towards humans from birds they said. Bet the vets is packed tomorrow with people demanding jabs for their cats and dogs, lets not forget the dogs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Smith Posted February 28, 2006 Share Posted February 28, 2006 But many people have already caught the disease directly from birds, the danger comes if it mutates and can be spread from human to human, which hasn't happened yet. Or cat to cat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adrianpmills Posted February 28, 2006 Share Posted February 28, 2006 I think the point is that if cats and dogs become infected, then humans stand more chance of catching it from them, rather than directly from birds. The more humans catch it the more chance the virus then has of mutating and passing between humans.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezShells Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 DohNoticed some feathers outside our front door today and the cat sat there cleaning himself!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Smith Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 The point I was trying to make was that we don't know if the cat caught bird flu or if there is a mutated strain that moves from cat to cat. Cat flu, I suppose. If the virus is mutating that is more dangerous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyh4 Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 Dick is absolutely right on this.Cats eat birds, birds (some) have bird flu - hence cat gets H5N1 - not necessarily because the virus has in any way mutated. My worry is that cats usually take smaller birds rather than large waterfowl (even sick ones), so does this mean that H5N1 is now at large in the general wild bird population? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 I don't want to sound panicky, but if the virus can be spread fromcontact with the droppings of sick birds, what is to stop the birdsleaving their infected droppings on open vegetable gardens or thelike? I realize we wash our fresh vegetables, but we do handlethem in washing them...I have, all along, worried about our dog. He loves being outsidein the garden and often chases birds. Perhaps all this hoopla isgetting to the brain cells... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Riff-Raff Element Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 The spread from bird to cat has happened before (Thailand lost dozensof zoo-bound big cats because some genius fed them the carcasses of fluridden chickens). Again, intimate contact is needed with uncookedinfected meat & offal for this to be a real danger. The mutationroute from cat to human is unlikely - we are not that similar, and catflu does not spread to humans as a rule. As far as droppings are concerned - the virus particles need to staymost to stay viable. In cool moist chicken manure they could survivefor (perhaps) weeks. In a little bit of dried out white stuff there isunlikely to be any danger. Wearing gloves when gardening (which isnever a bad idea - tetenus and toxioplasmosis spring to mind) andwashing of hands & produce I would have thought would be quiteadequate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Smith Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 A cat might not predate a duck, but it would certainly scavenge one. There might be a similar spread of disease with foxes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viv Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 Lori, I always wash salad vegetables in a dilution of the sterilising liquid or tablets that are used for babies bottles, and then rinse off in clean water. It doesn't affect the taste at all. There seems to be far more "economy " chicken ( which I never buy anyway) on sale in our local supermarket but they are still asking pre outbreak prices! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viv Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 [quote user="andyh4"]Dick is absolutely right on this.Cats eat birds, birds (some) have bird flu - hence cat gets H5N1 - not necessarily because the virus has in any way mutated. [/quote]But we humans eat birds too , I know that we cook them but we handle the raw meat. How can we be sure it is still safe to do so? Cearly still very little is known about this virus, especially how it mutates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weedon Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 Someone has to say it................What a catastropheweedon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaligoBay Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 Well said, Weedon.There was a point when AIDS was "only a few people", nothing to worry about. Then it was "only" gay men, still nothing to worry about, then. And oops, look where we are now!Nobody knows what could happen with this one. It could do the rounds and disappear again, or it could be here to stay.I bought a "mass-produced" roast chicken the other day. Disappointingly it tasted just as good as the twice-the-price poulet fermier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brilec Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 [quote user="Weedon"]Someone has to say it................What a catastropheweedon[/quote]Surely that can only be the case if you then get the head mounted on a plaque? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Riff-Raff Element Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 [quote user="Weedon"]Someone has to say it................What a catastropheweedon[/quote]No. This is just an irritation at the moment. If it combines andmutates, and retains it's extremely pathogenic nature in a form that iscommunicable in humans, then that would be a good time to panic. I know I will be.[:S]The current WHO assessment of the situation viz bird to human transmission is as follows: THE DISEASE IN HUMANS History and epidemiology.Influenza viruses are normally highly species-specific, meaning thatviruses that infect an individual species (humans, certain species ofbirds, pigs, horses, and seals) stay “true” to that species, and onlyrarely spill over to cause infection in other species. Since 1959,instances of human infection with an avian influenza virus have beendocumented on only 10 occasions. Of the hundreds of strains of avianinfluenza A viruses, only four are known to have caused humaninfections: H5N1, H7N3, H7N7, and H9N2. In general, human infectionwith these viruses has resulted in mild symptoms and very little severeillness, with one notable exception: the highly pathogenic H5N1 virus. Of all influenza viruses that circulate in birds, the H5N1 virus is ofgreatest present concern for human health for two main reasons. First,the H5N1 virus has caused by far the greatest number of human cases ofvery severe disease and the greatest number of deaths. It has crossedthe species barrier to infect humans on at least three occasions inrecent years: in Hong Kong in 1997 (18 cases with six deaths), in HongKong in 2003 (two cases with one death) and in the current outbreaksthat began in December 2003 and were first recognized in January 2004. A second implication for human health, of far greater concern, is therisk that the H5N1 virus – if given enough opportunities – will developthe characteristics it needs to start another influenza pandemic. Thevirus has met all prerequisites for the start of a pandemic save one:an ability to spread efficiently and sustainably among humans. WhileH5N1 is presently the virus of greatest concern, the possibility thatother avian influenza viruses, known to infect humans, might cause apandemic cannot be ruled out. The virus can improve its transmissibility among humans via twoprincipal mechanisms. The first is a “reassortment” event, in whichgenetic material is exchanged between human and avian viruses duringco-infection of a human or pig. Reassortment could result in a fullytransmissible pandemic virus, announced by a sudden surge of cases withexplosive spread. The second mechanism is a more gradual process of adaptive mutation,whereby the capability of the virus to bind to human cells increasesduring subsequent infections of humans. Adaptive mutation, expressedinitially as small clusters of human cases with some evidence ofhuman-to-human transmission, would probably give the world some time totake defensive action, if detected sufficiently early. During the first documented outbreak of human infections with H5N1,which occurred in Hong Kong in 1997, the 18 human cases coincided withan outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza, caused by a virtuallyidentical virus, in poultry farms and live markets. Extensive studiesof the human cases determined that direct contact with diseased poultrywas the source of infection. Studies carried out in family members andsocial contacts of patients, health workers engaged in their care, andpoultry cullers found very limited, if any, evidence of spread of thevirus from one person to another. Human infections ceased following therapid destruction – within three days – of Hong Kong’s entire poultrypopulation, estimated at around 1.5 million birds. Some experts believethat that drastic action may have averted an influenza pandemic. All evidence to date indicates that close contact with dead or sickbirds is the principal source of human infection with the H5N1 virus.Especially risky behaviours identified include the slaughtering,defeathering, butchering and preparation for consumption of infectedbirds. In a few cases, exposure to chicken faeces when children playedin an area frequented by free-ranging poultry is thought to have beenthe source of infection. Swimming in water bodies where the carcassesof dead infected birds have been discarded or which may have beencontaminated by faeces from infected ducks or other birds might beanother source of exposure. In some cases, investigations have beenunable to identify a plausible exposure source, suggesting that some asyet unknown environmental factor, involving contamination with thevirus, may be implicated in a small number of cases. Some explanationsthat have been put forward include a possible role of peri-domesticbirds, such as pigeons, or the use of untreated bird faeces asfertilizer. At present, H5N1 avian influenza remains largely a diseaseof birds. The species barrier is significant: the virus does not easilycross from birds to infect humans. Despite the infection of tens ofmillions of poultry over large geographical areas since mid-2003, fewerthan 200 human cases have been laboratory confirmed. For unknownreasons, most cases have occurred in rural and periurban householdswhere small flocks of poultry are kept. Again for unknown reasons, veryfew cases have been detected in presumed high-risk groups, such ascommercial poultry workers, workers at live poultry markets, cullers,veterinarians, and health staff caring for patients without adequateprotective equipment. Also lacking is an explanation for the puzzlingconcentration of cases in previously healthy children and young adults.Research is urgently needed to better define the exposurecircumstances, behaviours, and possible genetic or immunologicalfactors that might enhance the likelihood of human infection. Assessment of possible cases.Investigations of all the most recently confirmed human cases, inChina, Indonesia, and Turkey, have identified direct contact withinfected birds as the most likely source of exposure. When assessingpossible cases, the level of clinical suspicion should be heightenedfor persons showing influenza-like illness, especially with fever andsymptoms in the lower respiratory tract, who have a history of closecontact with birds in an area where confirmed outbreaks of highlypathogenic H5N1 avian influenza are occurring. Exposure to anenvironment that may have been contaminated by faeces from infectedbirds is a second, though less common, source of human infection. Todate, not all human cases have arisen from exposure to dead or visiblyill domestic birds. Research published in 2005 has shown that domesticducks can excrete large quantities of highly pathogenic virus withoutshowing signs of illness. A history of poultry consumption in anaffected country is not a risk factor, provided the food was thoroughlycooked and the person was not involved in food preparation. As noefficient human-to-human transmission of the virus is known to beoccurring anywhere, simply travelling to a country with ongoingoutbreaks in poultry or sporadic human cases does not place a travellerat enhanced risk of infection, provided the person did not visit liveor “wet” poultry markets, farms, or other environments where exposureto diseased birds may have occurred.The level of surveillence in place is the highest and best it has ever been. This disease is being taken extremely seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Smith Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 Viva - I think it may be an issue if you are in contact with droppings or dust from them, or handle live, feathered birds. Otherwise, we are being told it is safe. Certainly cooked chicken is safe as the virus is relatively fragile and is killed at quite low temperatures - below those which would cook the meat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.