NormanH Posted May 26, 2017 Share Posted May 26, 2017 I have just received this bill which is in fact a retroactive rise in prices for a period 2014-2015.I had heard it discussed before, but it seemed to have gone quiet, so I thought it might be one of those measures that are quietly dropped.Alas it has now reared its ugly head and I have the bill to pay.Has anyone else had the same? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mint Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 Yes but it was not as bad as I had feared Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suein56 Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 NormanH wrote : Has anyone else had the same?Me too, again not a lot extra to pay.Sue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chancer Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 I had mine over a year ago, maybe two years but seem to recall that they would be coming back for more for later years. So I changed suppliers [:D] Probably wont stop me from getting another bill though, wonder if they will cut me off if I dont pay? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idun Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 Isn't this a cheek! I was wondering if this affected anyone who uses a 'regie' system too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BJSLIV Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 I had changed supplier by the time they had the last catch up. Edf simply sent me their bill with a demand for payment by cheque, whereas they had previously collected by DD Incidentally the due day was the day before the bill arrived, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolybanana Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 The previous government tried to stop EDF raising its charges a few years ago but couldn't so they agreed to their reducing their charges but recovering them later.Same with the motorway charges which were held down, but in return for an extension of their contracts which were too watertight to be broken in any other way.With EDF, Hollande was shooting himself in the foot as the govt is a major shareholder and in need of money, so holding down charges meant less dividend for the common purse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NormanH Posted May 30, 2017 Author Share Posted May 30, 2017 I am now expecting a bill from my local restaurant who have decided that they hadn't been charging enough for the meals I ate there in 2014/2015.[:@] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now