Jackie Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 One insurance company has included the following in advertising blurb recently received."Conformément à un projet de loi adopté en octobre 2005, chaque lieu d'habitation devra prochainement être équipé d'un détecteur de fumée." Now, like many folk, we installed smoke detectors purchased in the UK and, I assume, they do not bear the NF stamp. So do we need to buy at least one detector so marked? I notice that the Brico stores are full of them just now!.......................................John not Jackie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard-R Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 They are selling them for 9.99€ in tridome (Carrefour), of late but they are not great products. Get a good system either from Germany or England. Our system in or house cost about 450€-900€ without fitting, We purchasses it from Switzland, for 500€. An alarm in each room, and set for different agents. It runs on solar power. Fully automatic, also links into our security system. Big savings on the normal insurance cost. The entire system's paid for it's self in 3 years.Total system = Fire and Security, was about 4000€ ( includes cctv, Voice, fire etc).and loads of other stuff, i.e. remote viewing, recording. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patmobile Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 I thought some new law must have been passed. We fitted at least two in each of our houses and gites, buying them in UK because they couldn't be found in France. Same, at the time, with fire extinguishers.Now, smoke alarms and extinguishers are suddenly on sale everywherePatrick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Riff-Raff Element Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 [quote user="Patmobile"]I thought some new law must have beenpassed. We fitted at least two in each of our houses and gites,buying them in UK because they couldn't be found in France. Same,at the time, with fire extinguishers.Now, smoke alarms and extinguishers are suddenly on sale everywherePatrick [/quote]We too fitted alarms, extinguishers and fire blankets in all ourproperties - not because we were obliged to, but because it seemedsensible. At the time, we brought them form the UK as we could find NOlocal supplier, rediculous as that might sound. I noticed at the timethat they all bore both the CE and NF marks and were supplied withFrench language instructions, which puzzled me the more. At least now Ican replace them easily once they expire. My undersatnding is that thisis only at the recommendation stage at present, though it is likely tobecome law in all rented property and new builds in fairly short order.I've been wrong before.[:O] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owens88 Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 Caution though. I cannot comment on the French law or the way that it will go but where similar rules apply in Britain they effectively mandate hard-wired smoke alarms (cos nobody ever checks batteries !).John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Val_2 Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 Well I go into many homes here and I have yet to see a single one fitted anywhere except for my own house. Like the scrapping of cars over four years old rule that the government were going to make,its probably another load of hot air(sorry about pun) that no one will enforce. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deimos Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 From what I heard, the reason smoke alarms have not been availablein France has been that they did not approve of the technology used to detectthe smoke. I believe a chemical used inthe sensors in the UK devices is extremely toxic (buried pretty deep in the devicesto unlikely to cause a problem – but that’s what I heard).I notice that all those now available in France (or the onesI’ve seen and the models I’ve purchased for my own use) are marked “optical”(i.e. use an optical sensor to detect smoke.Ian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BJSLIV Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 As the first post said........une loi adopté en octobre 2005, chaque lieu d'habitation devra prochainement ............The law has only just been passed, and the obligation to install alarms is to be phased over a five year period. Now to me that sounds a bit like the pool fence laws. So,we will all need to wait for AFNOR to lay down the rules (eta September 2010?) before we can know what type, specification, power source, will be allowed.No doubt anything purchased in the UK will haveto be replaced as I can almost guarantee that it will not meet the NF requirements, whatever they eventually turn out to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Riff-Raff Element Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 [quote user="Deimos"]From what I heard, the reason smoke alarms have not been availablein France has been that they did not approve of the technology used to detectthe smoke. I believe a chemical used inthe sensors in the UK devices is extremely toxic (buried pretty deep in the devicesto unlikely to cause a problem – but that’s what I heard).I notice that all those now available in France (or the onesI’ve seen and the models I’ve purchased for my own use) are marked “optical”(i.e. use an optical sensor to detect smoke.Ian[/quote]Some (most?) smoke alarms worldwide use a system based on theradioactive decay of isotope 241 of the element americium to detectsmoke particles. Although intensly radioactive, the nature of the decay(by something called alpha emission) means that in a smoke alarm thisposes no danger whatsoever to humans. If it were taken out andswallowed that might be a different matter.The French authorities are possibly concerned more with how used alarmsare disposed of. In most places they are chucked in the bin and getlandfilled. This is probably safe (and any marginal risk, it isargued, outweighed by the numbers of lives saved), but if the samewaste issued from a nuclear power station it would be subject to farmore stringent controls. The optical ones are meant to be good for fashburning hot fires, the radioactive ones for slow burning (I thinkthat's the right way round) so having both on site is considered best.I would imagine that once the matter of disposal is settled, the radiation based detectors will be available too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now