Jump to content

France overrun by les rosbifs?


Logan
 Share

Recommended Posts

[quote user="Clair"][quote user="viva"]Oh I would rather have Thatcher back than suffer any more of Blair and his crew.[/quote]

This is where we part company Viva.

As a foreigner in Britain during the Thatcher years, I felt like a 2nd class citizen, was told several times that I should go bug*er off back to France, that I was a bloody French scrounger, that I was paying less tax than a Brit (I was earning £19 a week at the time!)...

I remember where I was when she left and I remember how I rejoiced!

[/quote]

I was no lover of Lady Margaret and agree with Clair that many aspects of the UK during that era were decidedly “off”. However, I must agree with viva about Blair et. al.. Not relevant to the thread but some of what is going on there (UK) at the moment is quite disappointing. Fortunately his time is limited as more and more people are telling him “its time to go”. Unfortunately some things he has done cannot be undone by whoever comes next (e.g. the dead and injured).

Ian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 225
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

[quote user="Renaud"]

Now I belatedly understand what trolls and glove puppets are – should there not be a term for an individual using three identities. Bouffon, KatieKopyKat and Twinkle all seem to speak with one voice. The same one as Outcast and Mr Opas?

 

The relentlessly get-personal posts are unpleasant.

 

---

 

I would like to say how much I applaud Viva’s first post on this interesting thread.

 

[/quote]

I must admit Le Bouffon does sing a little off key but certainly not soprano, not the same voice or fingers come to that as the other 2 female posters you mention and you have got me in stitches at the thought of Le Bouffon on .a trampoline.

As for Outcast and Mr O, do keep up!

Mrs O

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clair

I am truely sorry that my oafish compatriots were so unpleasant to you. However the kind of pond slime who were insulting to you, would probably have been just as crass in Jim Callahan's time or John Major's or Tony Blair's.

However this kind of xenophobic behavior is central to this thread - being  rude and unfriendly to those who do not share your country of birth is decidedly nasty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote user="Clair"][quote user="viva"]Oh I would rather have Thatcher back than suffer any more of Blair and his crew.[/quote]

This is where we part company Viva.
As a foreigner in Britain during the Thatcher years, I felt like a 2nd class citizen, was told several times that I should go bug*er off back to France, that I was a bloody French scrounger, that I was paying less tax than a Brit (I was earning £19 a week at the time!)...
I remember where I was when she left and I remember how I rejoiced!

[/quote]

Oh please don' t fall out with me Clair. I know you are not a scrounger at all, and I do live in France now and I love it loads!

But she did OK by me for a good while ( although nobody admits voting for her now) and I didn't agree with all her policies but even less with the route Blair has taken and I did vote for him the first time around!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote user="Renaud"]

Now I belatedly understand what trolls and glove puppets are – should there not be a term for an individual using three identities. Bouffon, KatieKopyKat and Twinkle all seem to speak with one voice. The same one as Outcast and Mr Opas?

 

The relentlessly get-personal posts are unpleasant.

 

---

 

I would like to say how much I applaud Viva’s first post on this interesting thread.

 

[/quote]

I accept that Twinkle and KKK are not sock puppets but certainly 'meat puppets' see definition below.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_sock_puppet

Can they not communicate to each other in the normal way, by private email?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote user="viva"]Oh please don' t fall out with me Clair. I know you are not a scrounger at all, and I do live in France now and I love it loads!

But she did OK by me for a good while ( although nobody admits voting for her now) and I didn't agree with all her policies but even less with the route Blair has taken and I did vote for him the first time around![/quote]

Not falling out, just a different point of view! [}]

From where I was standing at the time, the whole Thatcher approach was not a positive thing. I realise it was progress for a lot of Brits after the strikes and piles of rubbish in the streets for weeks on end, but it did not feel good in my foreign shoes!

However, as things are going on in France at the moment, I kinda wish for someone with balls to stand up the the noisy minority shouting in the streets to tell them they DO NOT represent the majority. They're just a loud minority, only heard because the majority is silent...

But that is another topic altogether! [8o|]

PS: I voted for Bliar first time too... Even got a letter from Nº10 after I wrote to say "well done, use it well"... More fool me! [:$]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since you bring up the subject of Margaret Thatcher and the changes she forced through British society, I should like to draw a few parallels with modern day France. First a short history lesson!

Britain had suffered years of economic decline from the late sixties onward. The country was burdened by debt, a stagnating economy and economic mismanagement by successive governments holding on to the ideas of John Maynard Keynes. (1886-1946). No doubt some of you had his ideas thrust down your throats at uni. He was a pioneer of the principle of full employment. Without boring you all rigid with economic principals it will suffice as shorthand to say he believed governments had a duty to provide and regulate employment, not markets.

Those of you who are in business, now or then will know doubt understand easily what a fanciful principal full employment is. The world is now a global market place, like it or not. Employment is directly effected by markets. Governments can only look on and tinker at the edges. They are impudent in any influence or meaningful change. This means democratically elected governments of whatever colour. It’s just a fact of life we have to accept. Countries, like people need to make a living. All countries and companies need investment and capital from abroad.

Then we come to France who has yet to realise the realities of economic life in the twenty-first century. A large section of the population, vested interests, unions and workers believe France stands alone against the tide of change. They still believe street protests mean something , as in the era of the Paris riots of 1968. The real result from protest is usually political fudge, flight of capital and continued stagnation.

Ask yourself this question with hand on heart. As a capitalist investor would you risk investing in France? Rigid labour markets, state control which squeezes out incentive and initiatives. Taxation, corporate and personal beyond the acceptable norms.

Without investment employment declines. Without a government prepared to stand up to the tyranny of labour unions and the mob, industrial anarchy results. We know that from the history of the UK. Thatcher turned the corner and made Britain prosper.

France needs similar medicine, or, in my opinion the country will tumble into the abyss. I take no pleasure in that prospect. I love the country, people and culture. I just detest the system. The system did not make the country great, people did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I will admit through greated teeth that maggie did the right thing by the UK in the 80`s,the unions had played thier part,and she had to let them know who was boss,do you know how much even now a union boss gets paid and the underlings as well,expense accounts it is know wonder that the membership is at an all time low.As for France the time as come for a great big wake up call,the world does not move around France,but France it for the french people and does it`s best by them,abiet in never never land,la france will wake up but to what????????25% youth out of work, 12%+ adults out of work.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't agree with your opinions (and opinions they are, not facts). We obviously come at these questions from different political viewpoints and are unlikely to change. However, I feel strongly that you cannot separate the things you love,  the country, culture etc. and the system. If (or when , who knows) the system changes, the culture and people will also change. For many of us, the changes to British society during and after the Thatcherite era  were too great a price to pay for any  actual or perceived economic benefits.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote user="Russethouse"][quote]

"You are correct. That's why they specify those below the median income, ie the point halfway between the richest and the poorest, not the mean (average)."

My God, Dick! Are you this exciting in bed?[:S]

[/quote]

 

Mod hat on - That is quite far enough on the personal post front, you may think it vastly amusing, however others do not. Please respect ALL the other members of the forum, some of which may not share your sense of humour nor the hi jacking of discussions .

We all enjoy a little levity from time to time, please just choose your moment more carefully

Mod hat off

[/quote]So sorry Mrs. Smith
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For many of us, the changes to British society during and after the

Thatcherite era  were too great a price to pay for any 

actual or perceived economic benefits.

100% true and I for one, will certainly not mourn her passing, for

every one person that benefitted, many others did not and in the

end, those that thought they were doing well, found out the hard way and

that they had to pay dearly for their time of glory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

"So sorry Mrs. Smith"

Noooooooo! No relation.

Come on twinkle. It was a bit close to the bone. You and Dicksmith got off to a very bad start. One of the worst I have ever seen.

I hope this situation is recoverable.

Miki's back!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote user="Tresco"]

 

"So sorry Mrs. Smith"

Noooooooo! No relation.

Come on twinkle. It was a bit close to the bone. You and Dicksmith got off to a very bad start. One of the worst I have ever seen.

I hope this situation is recoverable.

Miki's back!

[/quote] He shouldn't have called me twinkly!

 And why didn't you come to my rescue when thingybob said that me, KKK and le bouffon (can you belive that) are all the same person?[:'(]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a load of rubbish,with out her who would we of had Mr Foot,do not make make laugh, next the welsh wind bag who went on to take the EU shilling(more like £500000 pa,not to mention the rest of his family)The unions ruined the UK in the 70`s it was maggie who had the balls to sort them out.How many that were out of work her day are out of work now?Now Blair wants to give it all away to the EU,just like the rebate,the same one he gave pieces of away last year,the fact that UK taxes will have to go up because of that may of passed you by.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well said Logan   My sentiments exactly, just wish I could have said them as you did, well done.

I personally don't believe that if France were to prosper and to have a brighter future it would mean that those here would lose their rural idyll that so many are frightened of losing.  Unfortunately, change is inevitable regardless of whether France prospers or declines. Therefore, I for one do love France and the French way of life in the beautiful countryside (even with all of the little pink boxes popping up in some very surprising places     ) but I also want to see it  prosper and do well and have its young in employment.

In fact, we would be moving over permanently much more quickly if it was easier to do business and to make a living in France. As it stands now we must wait until we can retire and unfortunately at that time will not be much of a contribution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He shouldn't have called me twinkly!

 And why didn't you come to my rescue when thingybob said that me, KKK and le bouffon (can you belive that) are all the same person?Crying [:'(]

But you are Twinkly! (to me anyway)

The other point I'm not sure when that occurred, but I remember seeing it more than once (perhaps in this thread even?).

I 'met' you later than others, and when I did it was clear to me you and Ms Kat knew eachother, but I also knew without doubt knew you had nothing to do with Le Bouffon. LOL to that notion.

Everything will pan out as it will. see my reply to K  Kat also.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote user="le bouffon"]What a load of rubbish,with out her who would

we of had Mr Foot,do not make make laugh, next the welsh wind bag who

went on to take the EU shilling(more like £500000 pa,not to

mention the rest of his family)The unions ruined the UK in the 70`s it

was maggie who had the balls to sort them out.How many that were out of

work her day are out of work now?Now Blair wants to give it all away to

the EU,just like the rebate,the same one he gave pieces of away last

year,the fact that UK taxes will have to go up because of that may of

passed you by.[/quote]

As they say in Poker, read 'em and weep (go on you know you can, even if the words don't appear to have any gaps !!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote user="WJT"]

 

I personally don't believe that if France were to prosper and to have a brighter future it would mean that those here would lose their rural idyll that so many are frightened of losing. 

[/quote]

As one who is not planning a rural idyll but life in a fairly average working  town, I object to being considered so superficial. That may be what you mean by liking the French way of life but it is not what I mean.

If the aftermath of Thatcherism had been  as you say then that might have justified some of her policies, but the truth is that the statistics for youth unemployment in the UK are kept artificially low by the use of government schemes and the  and withdrawal of  Jobseekers benefits from 16 and 17 year olds. Even given this, 1 in 4  16 to 17 year olds are registered as out of work. You cannot compare unemployment figures over past years any more as government policies have concentrated on moving people of every age group away from registering as unemployed, to fudge the employment figures. This is why there are so many people claiming incapacity benefit in the UK, to keep the unemployment figures artificially low. The same thinking has stopped the requirement for the over 60's  to sign on, so they are also not counted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote user="Logan"]

Since

you bring up the subject of Margaret Thatcher and the changes she

forced through British society, I should like to draw a few parallels

with modern day France. First a short history lesson!

Britain

had suffered years of economic decline from the late sixties onward.

The country was burdened by debt, a stagnating economy and economic

mismanagement by successive governments holding on to the ideas of John

Maynard Keynes. (1886-1946). No doubt some of you had his ideas thrust

down your throats at uni. He was a pioneer of the principle of full

employment. Without boring you all rigid with economic principals it

will suffice as shorthand to say he believed governments had a duty to

provide and regulate employment, not markets.

Those

of you who are in business, now or then will know doubt understand

easily what a fanciful principal full employment is. The world is now a

global market place, like it or not. Employment is directly effected by

markets. Governments can only look on and tinker at the edges. They are

impudent in any influence or meaningful change. This means

democratically elected governments of whatever colour. It’s just a fact

of life we have to accept. Countries, like people need to make a

living. All countries and companies need investment and capital from

abroad.

Then

we come to France who has yet to realise the realities of economic life

in the twenty-first century. A large section of the population, vested

interests, unions and workers believe France stands alone against the tide of change. They still believe street protests mean something , as in the era of the Paris riots of 1968. The real result from protest is usually political fudge, flight of capital and continued stagnation.

Ask yourself this question with hand on heart. As a capitalist investor would you risk investing in France?

Rigid labour markets, state control which squeezes out incentive and

initiatives. Taxation, corporate and personal beyond the acceptable

norms.

Without

investment employment declines. Without a government prepared to stand

up to the tyranny of labour unions and the mob, industrial anarchy

results. We know that from the history of the UK. Thatcher turned the corner and made Britain prosper.

France

needs similar medicine, or, in my opinion the country will tumble into

the abyss. I take no pleasure in that prospect. I love the country,

people and culture. I just detest the system. The system did not make

the country great, people did.

[/quote]

Logan - your (thoughtful) posting does deserve a response, but this

thread has gone so wildly of track that I'm afarid I cannot see much

point in replying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...