Jump to content

another collection of photos...


Rose
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Having looked at a few of these and decided that these people were perhaps not quite my type ( LOL !) I liked the phrase "It doesn’t matter where you go, you always take yourself" that I think is very true.

Another expression came to mind and that is " never, say never".[;-)]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been trying to find appropriate words to respond...  My mum always told me... If you can't think of anything nice to say then say nothing at all... so it's difficult [Www] 

They are indeed the most bizarre group of photos and I too felt uncomfortable viewing them.  I guess if this was the photographers intention, he succeeded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it was the photographer's intention to present these people as a collection of grotesques - he has succeeded. Once or twice I wondered whether they may be models and he has manufactured identities for them. Is there really a living to be made from selling second-hand golf balls recovered from water hazards?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wat a gwumpy loada silly dwibbles u are, expecially Nawmie. Thoz fotos iz FUN, a laugh and quite worrying. But as relevant as those of folks striking 'coz zay makes ya think n react. only Nawmie could be a thilly billy about them!

They are a take off of the old fotos of colonial and historic peoples, most often with the bodies of dead animals or natives surrounding them.

Laugh, almost as good as the Pirates of Penzance!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's odd because I have no problem with the idea that fat/thin/old/young/attractive/ugly/male/female or any combination of the above enjoy showing off and being photographed doing things that the rest of us would rather keep private, but I think, as Norman mentioned, it's the way they are posed which puts me off. 

THIS is the way to photograph people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote user="woolybanana"]

Wat a gwumpy loada silly dwibbles u are, expecially Nawmie. Thoz fotos iz FUN, a laugh and quite worrying. But as relevant as those of folks striking 'coz zay makes ya think n react. only Nawmie could be a thilly billy about them!

They are a take off of the old fotos of colonial and historic peoples, most often with the bodies of dead animals or natives surrounding them.

Laugh, almost as good as the Pirates of Penzance!!

[/quote]

Do you mean Pézenas? Other wise known as Guildford High Street?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote user="cooperlola"]

It's odd because I have no problem with the idea that fat/thin/old/young/attractive/ugly/male/female or any combination of the above enjoy showing off and being photographed doing things that the rest of us would rather keep private, but I think, as Norman mentioned, it's the way they are posed which puts me off. 

THIS is the way to photograph people.

[/quote]

He is one of the greats.

I think I posted a link about him aeons ago..

http://www.completefrance.com/cs/forums/1997030/ShowPost.aspx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote user="Frenchie"]

Sorry, off topic.

 

[/quote]Is it?  My problem with the photos Rose linked us to is that they utterly lack humanity, even though they are all of human beings.  They are vacuous and don't tell us anything - as is evidenced by the fact that he feels they require captions - a great photograph doesn't need words, as Doisneau proves (imho!)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poor old Norm, such a jaundiced view on life, and not accurate; a few Kooks perhaps worthy of pseuds corner, but this is my neck of the woods, I first saw the book in the restaurant in Chateau le mas de montet , and I have to admit I know a couple of peeps, bearing in mind the themes running through the book you might consider that the joke is on the viewer . . .
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote user="cooperlola"][quote user="Frenchie"]

Sorry, off topic.

 

[/quote]Is it?  My problem with the photos Rose linked us to is that they utterly lack humanity, even though they are all of human beings.  They are vacuous and don't tell us anything - as is evidenced by the fact that he feels they require captions - a great photograph doesn't need words, as Doisneau proves (imho!)[/quote]

(To please Normie) Perhaps that is the Brits abroad!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote user="cooperlola"]

It's odd because I have no problem with the idea that fat/thin/old/young/attractive/ugly/male/female or any combination of the above enjoy showing off and being photographed doing things that the rest of us would rather keep private, but I think, as Norman mentioned, it's the way they are posed which puts me off. 

THIS is the way to photograph people.

[/quote]

Totally agree, JE!

Met a keen monochrome photog a few weekends back: he was sporting two superb Rollieflex cameras and has recently taken up B & W.

We agreed, that the depth of image and contrast is unmatched when one wants to capture ambiance and meaning.

We met as Mrs Gluey and I were wandering along a favoured local wildlife retreat: here: and Here:

For me, yes the few dreadful images I looked at were quite enough to put me off me dinner!

Summed up, best, for me, as "Tracy Emin and Damien Hurst and Lord Satchi at Tate Modern meet the Sex Pistols in their formative years!"

Or, if you like, egoists and the emotionally unbalanced collide with a pretentious wannabe photog and do their best to try outrageous!

Yuk!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote user="just john "]Poor old Norm, such a jaundiced view on life, and not accurate; a few Kooks perhaps worthy of pseuds corner, but this is my neck of the woods, I first saw the book in the restaurant in Chateau le mas de montet , and I have to admit I know a couple of peeps, bearing in mind the themes running through the book you might consider that the joke is on the viewer . . .[/quote]

My post was a criticism therefore not something one can expect to be 'accurate' as opposed to a factual account.

I fail to understand, as seemingly do the majority of posters in this thread the idea that 'the joke is on the viewer'

These are images of vulgar,  often obese,  ugly, and to judge by their surroundings insulated from everyday life in France.

Please explain 'the joke'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...