
Deimos
-
Posts
2,921 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never
Posts posted by Deimos
-
-
[quote user="Russethouse"]
If I lost my child I'd want to know I had done everything possible to find out what had happened etc - would any of you feel differently ?
[/quote]
I had the impression from the reports that Mr Al Fayed was
not so much interested in finding out what happened but rather he had decidedwhat happened and wanted the guilty parties (HRH and security services) foundguilty. I had the impression there waslittle enquiry on his part but rather trying to prove what he had concludedwithout evidence.But then maybe the papers presented his actions in an unfair
light ?Ian
-
Sent you a PMIan
-
MI6 agent working for HRH with a "contract" on his son. Seems that Harrods now only has to provethat link and its all “sorted”.
Ian
-
http://newsbiscuit.com/article/2012-olympic-organisers-confident-of-fiasco-249Something I found funny (and who knows how true).Ian
-
-
I have no idea about whether treatment day and travel daycount in the 21 days. In theory DEFRAmight help but they are really only concerned about entry into UK rather thanentry into France. I have heard of oneor two people trying to get answers from the French authorities (on differentissues) and getting anywhere is “slow”. You might try the Agriculture Section of the British Embassy inParis. Their phone number used to be+33 (144) 51 32 56. A section might bea bit of a grand title as I suspect it is one or maybe two people who are notalways at their desk. However, when Ihave contacted them they have always been exceptionally helpful and they mightbe more knowledgeable re: the entry to France regs (or be able to get a quickerreply).
Whilst I tend to only use about 3 or 4 different routes, my
own dogs’ Pet Passports are checked more and more often now getting close toevery time. However, I have never usedthe tunnel so have no experience of procedures and practices there.[quote
user="sweet 17"]Megan, I wish for all your sakes that I could be more positive. But
our experience is this: it's not just the jab, there is the blood testand we were warned that the level has to be ridiculously high for the Frenchauthorities.[/quote]
Blood tests are only required to re-enter UK (and a couple
of other countries). Thus the French donot worry about the antibody level other than the vets checking it conforms tothe UK requirements when they fill-in that bit in a Pet Passport.Sorry I cannot be more help but do try the British Embassy
in Paris as they might be able to provide a way forward.Ian
-
It is very easy to make your own. I made a load a couple of years ago – no up to club standard but
great for a bit of practice in the garden.Keep your eye’s open with the Royal Canin 15 Kg sacks of
food as occasionally they give away a short rigid tunnel as a “gift” (I havealso seen these for sale relatively cheaply in Jardiland (occasionally).There is a book you can buy “How to build your own agility
equipment” – which I found not very helpful. Official heights and measurements of obstacles can be foundhttp://www.dogsport.ru/zadmin_data/paragraph.file_en/629/IFCS_Rules_Revised_July_2002.docor http://www.ukagility.com/Downloads/UKARegulations.pdf. Of course you may be able to simplify yourown ones if all your dogs are the same Class.Ian
-
Some of what has emerged is at first appearance quite
“disappointing”. I see that the taxpayer has to pay for Gordon Brown to have a Sky Sports subscription (why can henot pay for it himself ?). And as forPrescott’s grocery bill – well I guess there is a obvious comment there.I can now appreciate why there was so much effort by some
politicians to keep their expenses outside the Freedom of Information act. It does seem good that these things areemerging as, although I’m sure we are only getting one side of the story (e.g.not the side that says that Brown’s Sky Sports subscription if only forvisiting Heads of State or whatever), it probably will make MPs more carefuland thus maybe more aware that their role is to represent their electoraterather than screw the system for every penny they can.Ian
-
[quote user="Cathy"]Deimos - Thanks for that. But presumably you always have to have the dog chipped? It turns out the the dog that I am hoping to rescue is only tatooed.[/quote]
You will need the dog microchipped. However, there are special regulations that
allow for rabies vaccinations for tattooed dogs to be “transferred” to the“microchip” (i.e. for French dogs who are tattoo their history under the tattoocan still be counted). You will needthe tattoo registration paperwork for this to be done (in theory anyway) However, if the aims of your getting a PetPassport are to visit the UK then your main delay will be the 6 months.You should get the animal microchipped a.s.a.p. Get the vet to issue the Pet Passport at the
same time as the microchip is done and get him/her to record the last rabiesvaccination in the new Pet Passport (previous rabies blue or pink certificateswill have the animal’s tattoo number so he can add this OK to the PetPassport). Depending on how long agothe last rabies vaccination was the vet might recommend another booster andthen a blood sample after a month (can boost the anti-body levels and increasethe chances of a successful blood test). However, if you are planning a visit to the UK, make sure that theadditional month delay does not mess-up your plans.Ian
-
[quote user="Clarkkent"]
[quote user="cooperlola"]Funny Csinc because in the UK my cats' passports were issued when they were chipped, but without the blood test bit filled in so they had the documents but could not travel.[/quote]
You may be in possession of a passport, but it is not valid until the six months have passed.
[/quote]The Pet Passport is valid when it is issued and its validity
does not depend on a 6 month wait. Fortravel within most of Europe you only have to wait a month (or so) after therabies vaccination (but most dogs in France will have yearly rabiesvaccinations so there is no delay because of this). It is only to enter the UK (and a couple of other countries) youneed the successful blood test and a 6 month wait. This does not affect the Pet Passport validity for travel toother countries.Also, the 6 month wait starts from the date the successfully
tested blood sample was taken – so you do not have to worry about delays in thelab or getting paperwork back, etc.Ian -
In a general sense I hope that newspaper UK journalism does
not become timid. Ignoring thespecifics of the McCanns, of course it is wrong to print lies and unfoundedallegations but to take a few facts and try and draw a few conclusions (ideallypresented as conclusions) is an important function of the press.One thing I have noticed over recent years is how scared the
BBC news has become. Unsure of the truecause – maybe the Hutton Enquiry or some of its various scraps with thegovernment but these days it totally avoids controversial matters. When something controversial is required(because of its importance) it is brief with no “questions” or related info, noinvestigation. Compare the BBC to Channel4 news and the BBC effectively looks like a department of government PR. I often watch both BBC and Channel 4 earlyevening news and even when they are both half hour ones the difference isdramatic.What I think is important is that journalism remains
investigative, questioning and prepared to pursue something even when it mightbackfire on them.As far as the McCanns are concerned – they seek out
publicity but get really uptight when what is written is not 100% positiveabout them and not 100% supportive. Iactually think the McCanns circumstances illustrate failing in UKjournalism. Portuguese reporters wereprepared to actually investigate and question and found some very interesting(and not 100% McCann supporting) facts - real facts in terms of witnessstatements, conflicting reports, etc.. UK reporting was mostly all pro McCann and how they have done nothingwrong and supporting their sometimes questionable “facts”. As soon as McCanns get something “they don’tlike” its into court, threats, walking out of TV interviews, etc.. This is a general comment on therelationship between the McCanns and the press as I did not read the story thatcaused the latest thing.Personally I think there are some major questions about the
McCanns involvement in this. Maybe theyare guilty maybe not but it would certainly appear they have been less than100% honest and open with press (and thus presumably the Police as well). even their own story conflicts with itself.Ian -
[quote user="Cat"]
There are very, very few people, born in non-francophone countries, that have moved to live in France, that could ever pass for, or be accepted as, being French.
[/quote]I am continually taken as a French person on the telephone
(at least to begin with – but then they pick up the receiver, answer the calland I open my mouth …)Ian
-
[quote user="Dick Smith"]Do you shoot as Jpg or RAW?[/quote]
For my part: Both.
If I’m just “messing around” with nothing serious then
JPEG. However, if there is any chanceit might be something worthwhile then RAW. My main aim in getting this dSLR was to blot it to my telescope and findout just how hard astrophotography really is. I now have most of the adapters to bolt it on. For non-solar system objects then RAW is essential as thestacking software apparently makes a complete mess with JPEGs.Ian -
[quote user="tenniswitch"]
As to becoming tied to Photoshop for future editing, that's true only if you're saving in a Photoshop proprietary format. You should not have a problem if you save your photos in .TIFF or .jpeg formats.
[/quote]As I understand it Photoshop Lightroom has a “system” it
uses when you make changes to a picture. It does not modify the picture file itself but rather stores the changesyou make as a sequence of operations – and these changes are stored in its ownproprietary database. Once you havemade changes, if you reload the picture file at some point in the future theoriginal image is loaded then the changes you made are fetched from thedatabase and re-applied. Thus, stopusing Adobe Lightroom and you can get at your original file but not the workyou put into improving them. As Iunderstand it this applies to both Adobe proprietary formats, RAW images andstandards formatted images (i.e. everything. I have read that this is a new feature in Lightroom.However, I am repeating what I have read in various reviews
and publicity here as I do not have the package myself – I’m at the stage ofconsidering which one to get.Ian
-
I would have thought the better and more relevant question
would be “which parts/areas to avoid ?”. I don’t know Paris but is expect it is like virtually every other cityin the world – some areas are fine, other areas best avoided (depending of whatyou are looking for of course).Ian -
And why is she now covered by an emergency child protection
order (and so will not be going home with her parents) ?Ian
-
(In a general sense and not with regard to the specific
tragedy this thread is about …)That said, and whilst this is tragic I do think that society
must guard about becoming over protective. I do not know the details of the mothers situation and exactly what wasgoing on but I do think that travel to different countries, experiencingdifferent cultures, etc. is very good for a child’s upbringing.Children do need to be allowed a degree of freedom and
allowed to make mistakes. They cannotappreciate everything from “being told”. The difficulty comes in establishing a sensible balance. In the UK at the moment there seems aculture of excessive protection with the result that young people have the needfor a constant safety net – in effect not only wanting but needing the “nannystate”.These days seems that a child falls of a swing and grazes
his/her knee and there are calls to have the playground shut down, calls forthe person in charge of whoever owns the playground (e.g. the local mayor) toresign. And after the governmentenquiry has reported and every playground in the country now has to conform toregulations requiring to child be able to reach a anywhere more than 6 inchesabove ground level … . Thing is that itis actually important that the child falls of a swing occasionally – as theylearn that it hurts and what they do wrong, etc. Unfortunate but important. What is even worse is that very very occasionally the accident will bemore serious (e.g. broken leg), and exceptionally rarely somebody might die.Life is about risk. For each child seriously injured in a playground there will be many more
killed on the roads, or through many other stupid needless activities. I think that society needs to accept that unfortunateas it is, accidents will happen and doing everything possible to prevent thoseaccidents can sometimes be counter productive.I’m not trying to say that we accept the Goa murder as “part
of learning” but in life there will be occasional tragedies. But you cannot wrap a 15 year old in cottonwool and protect them from everything only to give them complete freedom ontheir 16th birthday – which would often have predictable consequences.I have a suspicion (without any evidence) that these sorts
of tragedies have been happening for years. What has changed is that they are now major news items with theassociated outcry. When I was a child Ihad great fun doing loads of things that many “well cared for” children would definitelynot be allowed to do these days. Iregularly had accidents and a few were serious. My friends were the same. Thinking back, were I doing the same today I doubt there would be timefor all the enquiries and “reviews” that my activities would cause.(Here I am talking about society in general and not the
specific circumstances of the 15 year old in Goa)But then never having kids probably makes me totallyunqualified to even comment on how they should be brought up.Ian
-
I think there are two issues here. Of course the person who committed the murder is the one who
committed the crime. However, inaddition to that I think people have a certain degree of choice in what levelof risk they expose themselves to.Many years ago I was walking through a city in Central
America when a Police car pulled up and the officer asked if I had been muggedyet. When I said no his response wasthat I probably only had to wait a few more minutes then. I was being daft walking where I was and hadI been mugged I would have received little sympathy as in some respects Ibrought the crime on myself. True themugger would have been the person who committed the crime but that it happenedto me would have been my fault in so far as I put myself in a very high riskposition (through my own choice – all be that because I did not know the areawell).It is unfortunate that crime is part of society these days –
but it is so people need to live with a degree of common sense and make somejudgements about risk and consequences. In the case of minors I always thought this would be the responsibilityof the parents.Ian
-
Had a look at the Corel one but they need their Spyware
system (a service from a 3rd party that scans your system collectinginfo and sending it to a 3rd party (NOT COREL) – something I willnot tolerate on my computer.Tried Adobe Elements and they also have their Spyware
service that collects info about your computer and sends it (hardly evenencrypted) off somewhere on the internet. again, I am happy to pay for a license and happy to have companies checkthat license when I e.g. run their program but I will not have people taking mycomputer’s resources 24/7 when I might only run the program occasionally. It is a diabolical liberty and also, from asoftware design structure completely unnecessary. For occasional use things (e.g. an occasional use license check)they you do not implement it as a service but you put the code in a DLL so itis only loaded when needed. What ismore, the uninstalls leave this spyware in and running (left in clogging upyour computer forever !!)I beggars belief how these companies can think it is their
right to install software you neither want nor need that collects informationand sends it off. They do not requirean internet connection and only use it “if it happens to be available” (i.e.not needed to verify your license).So I’m back on the freeware – not from cost perspective but because
eI am not prepared to accept spyware on my computer.I'll have a look at ACD See (check if it is spyware free once I've manually got this other stuff of my computer - editing the registry, etc.)
Ian
-
[quote user="Gluestick"]
Each and every time the media screens items on problem estates, anti-social behaviour, gang vandalism and etc, young kids are involved as well as teenagers.
No doubt whilst these kids are wreaking havoc on the law abiding, taxpaying majority, their parents are busy watching TV, playing bingo, boozing, or procreating with yet another partner.
[/quote]It’s OK. The
government have that problem sorted now. School kids are going to have to swear allegiance to the Queen (or theflag) – so problem sorted. Smart these politicians.Ian
-
I am having a look at Corel Paint Shop Pro Photo X2 and it
is a disaster. On they web site it saysit opens and handles Olympus RAW files (even lists my camera). even has the ORF file extension available inthe “Open Dialog” but when you select an file it complains it “does notrecognise the file type” and fails. Ihate it when a package claims to do something mainstream then you find it justdoes not work.Then, for some reason then need a service running 24/7 on
your computer (even when the photo editing is not running). This is a 3rd party process thatcollects information from your computer and sends it to a 3rd party(not even Corel !!!). Many people seemto think this is Spyware (as it meets many of the normal definitions ofSpyware). If every bit of software Ipurchased needed a small process running the entire time I would need quite afew massive capacity machines for all their little bits to be able to run(leaving no processor time for me to). You can trash this service with a bit of manual work but when you thentry to install any updates the install runs through, complains and thenun-installs itself.The package seems a complete disaster – not because it is
bad as such (not even got to look at it yet).Ian
-
[quote user="Russethouse"]
In many circumstances if you have been suspected of being irresponsible with regard to one child, authorities act to safeguard other children in the same family. Frankly I think this is probably correct, however where there have been such dreadful repercussions 'society' often takes the view that self blame is sufficient punishment.
The wider question is that should this always be the case ?
[/quote]I don’t have children and am not an expert but I thought
leaving several kinds under 4 in a hotel room whilst you go out for an eveningmeal with friends was considered by many to be irresponsible and in Portugalactually against the law. However,seems if you are well qualified UK authorities and Portuguese authorities willcompletely overlook it.Maybe such messages (i.e. behaving like this is not “irresponsible”)
just make it easier for parents to fail in their duty – after all, the McCanns “didnothing wrong” (a strong and often repeated message). Maybe if the authorities were a bit stricter about enforcing suchregulations other parents would start to think twice.Ian -
[quote user="cooperlola"]Ian, I have a copy of Nikon Picture Project which I have never even loaded into the PC as I already had Elements. You are welcome to it, if it's of any interest?[/quote]
Many thanks. I
actually got something with the camera (purchased the other week) but it islimited and had a really tacky user interface. Also, I did not get a Nikon so the Nikon package probably wont support the Olympus RAW format - but many thnaks for the offer.A lot of the concepts are new to me so I was thinking of
trying to select “the right” package to start with and stick with it throughlearning what is involved. I had a lookat GIMP (the free one) and it seems a bit “unstructured”. Adobe always worries me because they seem totie you into sticking with their software (as in the Lightroom method of savingall your work in Adobe’s Lightroom’s own proprietary database rather thanactually modifying your picture – so you always have to use their Lightroom toview/print/whatever the pic or you have lost the work !! I’d prefer something that actually changesthe pic so you could e-mail it to somebody else to view if you want.Not being an expert I don’t think I need the full Photoshop
level thing but don’t want anything too basic either. I was looking at Corel Paintshop Pro (?) which looks a reasonableprice.Ian
-
Although a tragic case, it has also been alleged that
earlier on the fateful evening she staggered out of a bar very “out-of-control”telling a passer by the cocktail of drugs she had consumed (which I cannotremember but there was LSD “on the list”). Thus seems she was not an “walking home unwisely” (or similar) but justout of control on “substance abuse” and completely unsupervised.However, the report of the above was from a British person
also in the area who has now disappeared saying he was scared and the BritishEmbassy were failing to help him. Also,given what he says he saw there are questions as to why he did not intervenelater to assist the poor girl. Thus onemight not want to treat his comments as completely reliable.Ian
Flying Lessons
in Sport, Leisure and Pastimes
Posted
I would not worry to much about the language. My French is pretty poor and when I learnt
(gliders) all the instructors refused to speak any English (although Isubsequently discovered one did speak quite good English, they always made mespeak/struggle with my French). When Istarted they explained that the control tower would understand “Mayday”(implying that they would all have a good laugh when I tried that).People teaching/learning will generally be keen and
enthusiastic and thus will make the effort to understand/be understood which is90% of the battle. If I can manage withmy poor French then I expect most people can.Ian